<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DNS Tunneling &#8211; Updated Source</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cyberphob1a.wordpress.com/2008/03/08/dns-tunneling-updated-source/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cyberphob1a.wordpress.com/2008/03/08/dns-tunneling-updated-source/</link>
	<description>Reasons to Fear the Matrix</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 12:02:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chita &#187; Túneis: Burlando (praticamente) qualquer tipo de restrição a internet</title>
		<link>http://cyberphob1a.wordpress.com/2008/03/08/dns-tunneling-updated-source/#comment-114</link>
		<dc:creator>Chita &#187; Túneis: Burlando (praticamente) qualquer tipo de restrição a internet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 01:44:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyberphob1a.wordpress.com/?p=53#comment-114</guid>
		<description>[...] diversas implementacoes de TCP over DNS, sendo as mais famosas: Ozymandns (com um fork aqui), NSTX, entre outras. Andei brincando um pouco com elas, e a que trouxe melhores resultados foi a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] diversas implementacoes de TCP over DNS, sendo as mais famosas: Ozymandns (com um fork aqui), NSTX, entre outras. Andei brincando um pouco com elas, e a que trouxe melhores resultados foi a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: unxed</title>
		<link>http://cyberphob1a.wordpress.com/2008/03/08/dns-tunneling-updated-source/#comment-110</link>
		<dc:creator>unxed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 09:49:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyberphob1a.wordpress.com/?p=53#comment-110</guid>
		<description>Hardcoding the $timeout to &quot;0.1&quot; in the beginning of loop_once cycle in DNS::Nameserver helped me to increase connection speed twice.

Also you may try to replace can_read calls used to timeout connections in NET::DNS::Nameserver to something like this:

  eval {
        local $SIG{ALRM} = sub { die &quot;Timed Out&quot; };
        alarm 1;
        ### IO function call goes here
        alarm 0;
    };
    if ($@ and $@ !~ /Timed Out/) {
        die
    }

This should give a 1 second timeout on the function call.

PS: You may aslo try to look through this article:
http://www.perlmonks.org/index.pl?node_id=193076</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hardcoding the $timeout to &#8220;0.1&#8243; in the beginning of loop_once cycle in DNS::Nameserver helped me to increase connection speed twice.</p>
<p>Also you may try to replace can_read calls used to timeout connections in NET::DNS::Nameserver to something like this:</p>
<p>  eval {<br />
        local $SIG{ALRM} = sub { die &#8220;Timed Out&#8221; };<br />
        alarm 1;<br />
        ### IO function call goes here<br />
        alarm 0;<br />
    };<br />
    if ($@ and $@ !~ /Timed Out/) {<br />
        die<br />
    }</p>
<p>This should give a 1 second timeout on the function call.</p>
<p>PS: You may aslo try to look through this article:<br />
<a href="http://www.perlmonks.org/index.pl?node_id=193076" rel="nofollow">http://www.perlmonks.org/index.pl?node_id=193076</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cyberphob1a</title>
		<link>http://cyberphob1a.wordpress.com/2008/03/08/dns-tunneling-updated-source/#comment-74</link>
		<dc:creator>cyberphob1a</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 08:16:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyberphob1a.wordpress.com/?p=53#comment-74</guid>
		<description>No, that&#039;s the whole point of DNS tunneling. Access to any DNS server that does recursive lookups is enough.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, that&#8217;s the whole point of DNS tunneling. Access to any DNS server that does recursive lookups is enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fryxar</title>
		<link>http://cyberphob1a.wordpress.com/2008/03/08/dns-tunneling-updated-source/#comment-73</link>
		<dc:creator>fryxar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 20:21:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyberphob1a.wordpress.com/?p=53#comment-73</guid>
		<description>Hi!  I have not tested it yet, but does this tool supports DNS tunneling in a Intranet that use a DNS forwarding servers as resolvers?  Or must you have direct connectivity of your &quot;magic&quot; DNS server?  Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi!  I have not tested it yet, but does this tool supports DNS tunneling in a Intranet that use a DNS forwarding servers as resolvers?  Or must you have direct connectivity of your &#8220;magic&#8221; DNS server?  Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Speeding up DNS Tunneling &#171; Cyberphobia</title>
		<link>http://cyberphob1a.wordpress.com/2008/03/08/dns-tunneling-updated-source/#comment-69</link>
		<dc:creator>Speeding up DNS Tunneling &#171; Cyberphobia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 11:39:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyberphob1a.wordpress.com/?p=53#comment-69</guid>
		<description>[...] [Update: I&#8217;ve uploaded the source in the mean time and wrote about it here]  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] [Update: I&#8217;ve uploaded the source in the mean time and wrote about it here]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
